ম্যানকেডিং কেন ক্রিকেটের চেতনার বিরুদ্ধে
Mankading is a method of run-out in cricket where the non-striker is dismissed by the bowler if they leave their crease before the ball has been delivered – it’s named after the legendary Indian cricketer, Vinoo Mankad. This controversial dismissal often triggers strong debates among critics and experts, who argue that although technically legal, mankading contravenes the ‘spirit of cricket.’
Understanding The Spirit Of Cricket
The ‘spirit of cricket’ refers to an unwritten ethical code or cornerstones of sportsmanship that underpin this gentleman’s game. These principles include respect for opponents, fair play, graciousness in victory or defeat, and upholding traditions of politeness – dismissing players through mankading often considered as acting against these virtues.
Governing bodies like International Cricket Council (ICC) have included clauses around “fair and unfair” play in their code of conduct including Law 41.16 which specifically outlines mankading – indicating its recognition as one among other contentious tactics within professional cricket.
Why Mankading Is Controversial?
Mankading is viewed as unscrupulous because it targets error from non-strikers rather than contesting them through normal bowling methods. Critics suggest it undermines skill-based competition – putting greater emphasis on technicality and soft ruleset manipulation over pure talent or athletic prowess. It may provide easy wickets but doesn’t reflect true caliber of a player or team.
Moreover, there are practices within cricket that both batsman and bowlers follow out of mutual respect- refraining from mankading happens to be one such practice. In many instances when a non-striker leaves his crease early, instead of mankading him, the bowler warns him. This act goes beyond individual interests fostering camaraderie ensuring better embodiment of ‘spirit of cricket’.
Significant Mankading Instances
Historically, several incidents of mankading have stirred controversy. The method got its name from Vinoo Mankad who dismissed Australian player Bill Brown twice in this manner during India-Australia series 1947; triggering debate on the ethics of such dismissal.
Full Video in Youtube
More recent cases include that of Jos Buttler’s run out by Ravichandran Ashwin during an IPL match in 2019 and Richard Ngarava’s removal by India U19s’ captain Keemo Paul during 2016 ICC U19 World Cup – these instances reigniting the old debates surrounding mankading.
The Counter Argument For Mankading
Defending mankading often revolves around contesting unfair advantage non-strikers acquire leaving crease early – offering harder targets for bowlers to hit stumps, helping score quick singles or reducing reaction time for fielders.
Some argue if stepping over line while delivering ball costs bowler a no-ball, why should similar leniency be offered to batsmen? Detractors point towards the double standards within cricket where certain deeds are deemed ungentlemanly while penalties against others get normalized with time.
Should Spirit Of Cricket Overrule Rules?
Spirit of cricket as essential it might be, it remains nebulous, unquantifiable – susceptible to individual perspectives making uniform application trickier. Relying purely on ‘spirit’ could result in inconsistency or confusion, hence formal rules act necessary part ensuring order in game proceedings.
Therefore to solve ambiguity over mankading there may be possible solutions: either universally accepting it as standard practice or allowing first warning before proceeding with dismissal. This middle-ground approach could accommodate interests of both camps – upholding spirit of cricket while maintaining competitive fairness.
In conclusion, While critics claim mankading works against spirit of cricket; others view it as a strategic remedy against batsmen’s indiscipline. It remains within technical legality of the game but its ethical implications continue to divide opinion. The dilemma reflects broader conflicts within cricket and sports at large – where do we draw line between competitive advantage and fairness, rules and unwritten code, victory and respect?
