Why football is better than cricket
When it comes to discussing the most popular sports in the world, two names that often come up are football and cricket. Both have an extensive following across continents; however, there has always been a continued debate on which sport is better. It’s an argument that may never reach a conclusion because of individual preferences. But for several reasons – ranging from accessibility and universal appeal to simplicity and excitement – it can be said that football reigns supreme over cricket.
Global Popularity
If we consider the number of nations where each sport is played and followed passionately, Football clearly outshines cricket. According to FIFA, more than 200 countries play football, making it one of the most universally recognized sports. On the other hand, Cricket is mainly followed in former British colonies such as India, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan and England itself.
Accessibility
Football’s simplicity is perhaps its biggest charm which makes it accessible to people from all walks of life, regardless of financial status or geographic location. A game of Football requires only a ball and some open space; these requirements can easily be met anywhere-from Brazilian favelas to European city parks. In contrast, Cricket requires specific equipment like bats, balls, wickets and protective gear along with a significantly larger playing field.
Pace Of Play
One significant advantage of Football over Cricket involves pace and duration of play. A match of football lasts about 90 minutes with additional time being relatively short. This keeps viewers engaged throughout with hardly any dull moment owing to constant action — both in offence and defence. Cricket matches, particularly Test format games, span over five days at times resulting easy losses in spectators’ interest due to lulls amidst the gameplay.
Full Video in Youtube
Universality
In football, despite occasional variations or tweaks here-and-there, rules are globally identical irrespective of the country. This universality makes it easier for anyone to comprehend and enjoy irrespective of where it is played or broadcasted from. In contrast, cricket changes its rules considerably across its three different formats — be it Test matches, ODIs or Twenty20s which can easily confuse relatively new enthusiasts.
Freedom Of Expression
Football offers a plethora of tactics and formations thanks to more significant player count (11 vs 11) allowing teams to develop unique styles of play that reflect geographical or club level cultures. Dutch’s “Total Football”, Brazil’s “Samba Style”, Italy’s “Catenaccio” etc., are testimony towards this aspect in football; whereas in Cricket, game progression isn’t as varied due to standard batting/bowling rotations.
The Element Of Surprise
Every match in football has an inherent unpredictability making no outcome entirely sure until the final whistle blows. Even smaller clubs are every now and then known to defeat giants at what are only predictably called upsets in hindsight. In cricket, however, a clear pattern emerges more often with games often tilted majorly toward one side once things begin going their way – much reducing suspenseful conclusion aspect.
These elements would seem to indicate that not only does football have wider appeal than cricket, but also provides players with opportunities for extraordinary athleticism while spectators enjoy roller-coaster ride full of excitement and surprises throughout gameplay duration. Thus reinforcing why many believe football is indeed ‘The Beautiful Game’. It doesn’t minimize the importance of cricket nor its place in sports culture but highlights why Football has been captivating hearts worldwide at an unparallel magnitude since long.
